🔗 Share this article

As global leaders convene in the Brazilian Amazon for the 30th UN Climate Change Conference, it is vital to review how we are faring together in cutting global greenhouse gas emissions.

Despite 30 years of United Nations climate conferences, nearly 50% of the CO2 built up in the atmosphere since the Industrial Revolution has been emitted since 1990. Incidentally, 1990 marked the release of the initial scientific evaluation by the IPCC, which verified the danger of human-caused global warming. While researchers work on the Seventh Assessment Report, they do so knowing that their work remains eclipsed by political agendas. Despite sincere attempts, the planet is still dangerously off track to prevent catastrophic climate change.

Unprecedented CO₂ Levels and Carbon-Based Fuel Dependency

Recent data show that atmospheric carbon dioxide levels reached a new peak of 423.9 parts per million in the year 2024, with the growth rate from 2023 to 2024 surging by the biggest annual rise since modern measurements began in 1957. Based on the Global Carbon Project, 90% of total global CO₂ emissions in last year originated from burning fossil fuels, while the remaining 10% was due to land-use changes such as forest clearance and wildfires.

Although the rise in fossil CO₂ emissions in recent times was driven by higher use of gas and oil—accounting for over half of global emissions—coal burning also reached a record high, constituting forty-one percent. Despite Cop28’s global stocktake calling for nations to move beyond carbon fuels, collective plans still aim to extract over twice the quantity of hydrocarbons in 2030 than aligns with limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, with continued extraction of natural gas justified as a less polluting transition fuel.

The Mirage of Eco-Friendly Measures

Instead of focusing on financial motivators to accelerate the elimination of carbon fuels, climate policies are overly dependent on feel-good eco-positive solutions that aim to cancel out CO2 output by afforestation instead of reducing industrial emissions. Although conserving, expanding, and rehabilitating natural carbon sinks like forests and wetlands is inherently good, studies has demonstrated that there is not enough land to achieve the global goal of net zero emissions using nature-based solutions by themselves.

Approximately one billion hectares—an area larger than the USA—is needed to meet carbon neutrality commitments. More than 40% of this land would need to be converted from existing uses like agriculture to carbon sequestration projects by 2060 at an never-before-seen pace.

Although this ideal restoration could be realized, forests take time to mature and are susceptible to fires, so they should not be viewed as a quick or permanent carbon storage solution, especially in a rapidly shifting environment. While severe temperatures and aridity engulf more of the planet, these well-intentioned efforts could literally go up in smoke.

The Diminishing of Planetary Absorbers

Research data tells us that about 50% of the total CO₂ emitted each year stays in the air, while the remainder is absorbed by oceans and land ecosystems. With global heating, these environmental absorbers are losing efficiency at capturing CO₂, meaning that additional CO2 accumulates in the air, intensifying climate change. Transferring the reduction responsibility onto the land sector effectively excuses the oil and gas sector from the urgency to cut pollution in the near future.

The Carbon Debt and Future Generations

Achieving net zero by 2050 requires carbon dioxide removal (CDR), which currently relies almost exclusively on land-based measures to absorb surplus CO2 from the atmosphere. Emitting companies can easily purchase offsets to compensate for their discharges and continue with normal operations. Meanwhile, the energy imbalance resulting from the combustion of hydrocarbons continues to further destabilise the global climate system. Essentially, we are increasing our climate liability to our planetary credit card, passing on our descendants with an insurmountable burden.

To curb the scale and duration of overshoot the global warming targets, the world ultimately needs to surpass the balancing impact of net zero and begin to drawdown past carbon outputs to achieve net negative emissions.

The Political Distortion of Net Zero

Based on the most recent data from the Global Carbon Project, plant-based carbon removal is currently capturing the equal of about 5% of yearly CO2 from fuels, while engineered carbon extraction represents only about one-millionth of the CO2 emitted from carbon sources. Optimistic industry estimates place it at around zero point one percent of total global emissions. At the risk of sounding like a heretic, the political distortion of carbon neutrality is a deceptive gap that takes focus away from the research-based necessity to eradicate the primary cause of our overheating planet—carbon-based energy.

The Critical Requirement for Definite Steps

Although this scientific reality should dominate talks at Cop30, past events suggests that gradual, cautious steps and deference to politics will prevail. Ambiguous promises of long-term goals will keep on postpone the urgent need for concrete immediate action. Unless leaders are brave enough to put a price on carbon to bring the era of fossil fuels to a definitive end, we are adding increasing amounts of CO2 to the atmosphere, compounding the environmental disaster now unfolding across the globe.

The challenge we confront is simple: take real action to the evidence-based situation of our crisis or suffer the results of this profound moral failure for generations ahead.